🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are considering comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy could be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to approve a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a good starting point," said the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in strong data".

Last year, support gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering harmful platform posts argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is largely happening at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to follow this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "could backfire". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this international discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.